The Court dismissed a Civil Writ Petition as withdrawn by the petitioners. No interim order was made, and pending applications were disposed of.
Present petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.12781 of 2008
Date of Decision: 09.03.2023
____________ ___________________________________________ Sh. Baldev Singh Chauhan & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh& Anr. … Respondents
_______________________________________________________ Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals.
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
In terms of order dated 15.12.2022, both the petitioners
have come present in Court. They state that they do not wish to prosecute the case further and they shall have no objection in case the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
March 09,2023 (shankar)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Baldev Singh Chauhan
The State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
