Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a connection with liberty to file afresh with better particulars; the Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition granted; liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3322 of 2023.
Date of decision : 12.7.2023. Urmila Zinta ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Dy. A.G. and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Permission granted. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge.
(Satyen Vaidya) 12th July, 2023 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Urmila Zinta
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
