This High Court disposed of Writ Petition CWP No. 2551 of 2023 against the respondent, noting that no separate order was necessary due to a prior order in CWP No. 2880 of 2023.
No separate order; writ petition disposed of as per order in CWP No. 2880 of 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 2551 of 2023 Decided on: 12th October, 2023
____________________________________________________ State of H.P and others ....Petitioners. Vs. Sunita Thakur …..Respondent. ____________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Arsh Rattan and Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocate Generals. For the respondent: None.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (oral)
In view of order passed in CWP no.2880 of 2023, no order is
necessary in this Writ petition.
applications, if any.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao ) Chief Justice
12th October, 2023 (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) (priti) Judge
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
State of H.P and others
Sunita Thakur
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
