Dismissed
Sunil Thakur v. the State of Hp and Others
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/2192/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.2192 of 2023
Date of Decision : 7th July, 2023
Dr. Sunil Thakur
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others
……Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma & Ms. Sharmila Patiyal, Additional Advocates General, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the State.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive relief(s): -
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
in AIIMS Bilaspur may kindly be held illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjustified, invalid unconstitutional discriminatory and unsustainable in the eyes of law.
(ii) That the respondents/respondent No. 1 may Kindly be directed to issue No Objection Certificate in favour of the petitioner for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia in All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P.”
( Satyen Vaidya) Judge
July 07, 2023 (KS)
Dr. Sunil Thakur
The State of Himachal Pradesh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court