Neela Dass v. State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought revised pension and gratuity benefits. Court permitted petitioner to submit representation to respondent for considering claims, without deciding merits or questions of law.
What did the court decide?
Permission to submit representation to respondent for claiming revised pension and retiral benefits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.10277 of 2023
Decided on: 14th December, 2023
__________________________________________________________ Neela Dass
State of H.P. and others
....Petitioner Versus ……Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3- State.
Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4-Accountant General.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to representation for claiming revised pension and gratuity benefits despite pending finality of a related judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neela Dass
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Ranjan Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/10277/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court