Disposed
Shyam Lal v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCRMPM/3018/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
vs. State of H.P. Cr.M.P.(M) No.3018 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
vs. State of H.P. Cr.M.P.(M) No.3018 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shyam Lal vs. State of H.P. Cr.M.P.(M) No.3018 of 2023.
05.12.2023. Present: Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, Legal Aid Counsel, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. I.N. Mehta and Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.S.Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent.
Cr.M.P. No. 4505 of 2023.
Allowed as prayed for. The application stands
disposed of.
Cr.M.P.(M) No. 3018 of 2023.
Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent.
For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the fact that the applicant/appellant is not only behind the bars but the instant application/appeal has otherwise been filed through Legal Aid Counsel, we deem it appropriate to condone 63 days’ delay that has crept up in filing of the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2023.
Admit.
Call for the records.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
5th December, 2023. (krt)
Shyam Lal
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court