Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 2812 of 2022 Decided on: 2nd January, 2023
_____________________________________________________ Tarsem Singh Versus State of H.P. ______________________________________________________
…...Petitioner Versus
…..Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Nikhil Chugh, Advocate. For respondent : Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals. HC Anant Kumar, P.S. Fatehpur, Distt. Kangra, H.P., is present in person alongwith records.
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.
petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Sandeep Sharma ) Judge
January, 02, 2023
(himani)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Tarsem Singh
State of H.P.
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
