The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a miscellaneous petition as infructuous due to intervening developments without appointing a bench or deciding on merits.
Petition disposed as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No.80 of 2020 Decided on: 14th June, 2023 _________________________________________________________________ Manohar Lal ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Pavnesh sharma & Anr. …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. __________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
due to intervening developments, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Hence, it is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. The Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
June 14, 2023 R.Atal
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Manohar Lal
Dr. Pavnesh sharma
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
