The court disposed of a contempt petition, observing that the impugned order had been complied with belatedly, and discharged the notice.
Notice is discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 359/2023 Decided on : 01.12.2023
Kuldeep Chand …..Petitioner Versus Dr. Amarjeet Sharma. ….Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Navlesh Verma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs. for the respondent.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
even though belatedly, therefore, I see no reason to keep this contempt petition alive and the same is accordingly disposed of. Notice is discharged.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge 01.12.2023 (pankaj/GM)
01.12.2023
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Kuldeep Chand
Dr. Amarjeet Sharma
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
