Disposed

Anchla Kumari v. Subhashish Panda and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC12 Jun 2023COPC/107/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding, the court closed the matter as the respondents had passed a consideration order complying with prior directions. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach a forum for redressal of grievances against that order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to seek appropriate remedy against the consideration order; pending applications disposed of.

Anchla Kumari Vs Subhashish Panda and Ors. — Service and Employment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

COPC No.107 of 2023 Decided on: 12^thJune, 2023
_________________________________________________________________ Anchla Kumari ....Petitioner
Versus
Subhashish Panda & Ors …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
__________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶3

Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on

¶4

record instruction memo dated 09.06.2023, issued from the office of the Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD, Shimla alongwith consideration order dated 02.06.2023 passed in the case of the petitioner, in compliance to the judgment dated 09.09.2022, rendered in CWP No.6048 of 2022 (Anchla Kumari Vs. State of H.P. and others). Operative part of the consideration order reads as under: -

¶5

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶6

¶7

“Since, the Hon’ble Court in its order dated 09.09.2022 and order dated 17.05.2023 has directed to implement the judgment in letter and spirit, therefore, in compliance to the directions dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No.6048/2022 and also to purge out of contempt proceedings, the claim of the petitioner is hereby considered for the post of Peon (ClassIV) on daily waged basis, subject to the legal remedies available to the department. Further, the appointment to the petitioner on compassionate grounds for the post of Peon on daily waged basis will be issued in terms of seniority of approved cases & availability of vacancies under 5% quota meant for compassionate appointments in near future. This order shall not be treated as a precedent by any other person.”

¶8

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶9

the petitioner be permitted to assail the consideration order to the extent it is against her.

¶10

3. In view of the fact that the respondents have now passed the consideration order, these contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of her surviving grievances against the consideration order.

¶11

¶12

The Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,

¶13

also stand disposed of.

¶14

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶15

June 12, 2023 R.Atal

Anchla Kumari v. Subhashish Panda and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anchla Kumari v. Subhashish Panda and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durga Dass Deceased through Lr Harvinder Singh Thakur and Others Vs Jagdish

Roshan lal Vs Manoj kumar son of Shri Dina Nath

Sandeep Kumar Vs State

Shyam Lal Vs Sarita Kumari

M/S C and C Constructions Ltd. Vs the Hp Road and Other Infrastructures Development Corporation Ltd.

M/S C and C Constructions Ltd. Vs the Hp Road and Other Infrastructures Development Corporation Ltd.