Dismissed

General Manager Northern Railway v. Harmesh Singh and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC3 Apr 2023CMP.M/188/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant failed to appear despite multiple proceedings. Having neglected steps for service of the respondent, the High Court dismissed the application and appeal for want of prosecution and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

The application and appeal were dismissed for want of prosecution; pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of.

General Manager Northern Railway Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Himachal Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

CMP(M) No.188 of 2022 Decided on: 3^rd April, 2023

¶3

_________________________________________________________________ General Manager, Northern Railway ....Applicant/Appellant

¶4

Versus Harmesh Singh & Ors. …Respondents

¶5

________________________________________________________________ Coram_

¶6

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶7

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶8

_________________________________________________________________ For the applicant/: None. Appellant. For the respondents: Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta & Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Additional Advocates General, for respondents No.2 and 3.

¶9

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶10

The matter has been repeatedly passed over, however, none has appeared on behalf of the applicantappellant.

¶11

2. The order sheets dated 12.05.2022, 15.10.2022, and 14.12.2022 reflect that the applicant-appellant has not taken steps for service of respondent No.1. On 01.03.2023,

¶12

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶13

¶14

following order was passed in the matter: -

¶15

“Final opportunity of two weeks is granted to the applicant-appellant to take steps for service of respondent No.1. In case the steps are taken within the aforesaid period, notice be issued to respondent No.1, returnable for 03.04.2023.

¶16

List on 03.04.2023.

¶17

Name of Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, be reflected henceforth n the cause list for the applicant-appellant.”

¶18

3. The office reported that even now steps for service of respondent No.1 have not been taken.

¶19

4. In view of the aforesaid situation, it appears that

¶20

the applicant-appellant is not interest to pursue the matter. accordingly, the application and appeal are dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶21

The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶22

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶23

April 3, 2023 R.Atal

General Manager Northern Railway v. Harmesh Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

General Manager Northern Railway v. Harmesh Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hitesh Sublaik Vs State of Hp

Akhil Vs State of Hp

Anil Kapoor Vs Dipika Chauhan

Virender Kanwar and Anr. Vs State of Hp and Anr.

Sumesh Kumar Rana Vs State of Hp and Others

Kajal Kashyap Vs State of Hp and Another