Ram Saran v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court in an execution petition directed closure of proceedings with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order subsequently passed by the authority on merit.
What did the court decide?
Execution proceedings ordered to be closed with liberty to assail the rejection order subsequently passed by the authority.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ON THE 13th DAY OF JUNE, 2022, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL. EXECUTION PETITION NO. 38 OF 2022.
Between:
RAM SARAN, S/O SH. SANT RAM, R/O VILLAGE AMBOTA POST OFFICE TAKSAL, TEHSIL KASAULI, DISTRICT SOLAN, H.P. (RETIRED AS DRIVER FROM HRTC PARWANOO UNIT).
…PETITIONER
(BY MR. RAKESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
HIMACHAL PRADESH ROAD TRANSPORT THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OLD BUS STAND, SHIMLA, HP.
…RESPONDENT
(BY MR. AJAY KUMAR CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Saran
- respondent
Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation
Coram
Ajay Mohan Goel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- EX.PT/38/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court