Dismissed
Tej Singh v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/4292/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 21st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
CIVIL WRIT PETITION ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.
4292 OF 2020
Between:
TEJ SINGH S/O SH. DOLA DASS, R/O TARA COLONY, CHURAT ROAD NEAR BHATAKUFFER, P.O. SANJAULI, TEHSIL SHIMLA (U), DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P., PRESENTLY POSTED AS LAW OFFICER IN DIRECTORATE OF FOOD, CIVILL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS, H.P., SHIMLA-9.
…PETITIONER
(BY MR. DIGVIJAY SINGH, ADVOCATE)
2
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PR. SECRETARY (FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF H.P., SHIMLA2.
2. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (FINANCE), GOVT. OF H.P., SHIMLA-2.
3. DIRECTOR, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SHIMLA-9, H.P.
…RESPONDENTS
(MR. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR. VINOD THAKUR AND MR. SHIV PAL MANHANS, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERALS, MR. BHUPINDER THAKUR, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL)
This Petition coming on for admission on this day, Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , passed the following:-
3
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, states that the instant petition is rendered infructuous with the efflux of time. His statement is taken
on record.
infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) Judge
October 21, 2022
Kalpana
Tej Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court