Sher Singh v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
Versus HRTC and another alongwith connected…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vinod Kumar Versus HRTC and another
alongwith connected matters
CWP No.8331 of 2022 a/w CWP Nos.8333,
8334, 8347, 8353, 8355, 8356, 8363 & 8364 of 2022
- 21.07.2023 Present: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s) in all the petitions.
Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents in all the petitions.
Learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation
has submitted that the judgments in question have been complied with as the respondents have passed separate office orders in the cases of the petitioners. In terms of the separate office orders, the claim of the petitioners has been considered and rejected. The copy of the office orders has been placed on record in all the cases.
In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in these matters. The proceedings are closed.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 21, 2023 Judge Mukesh
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Kumar
- respondent
HRTC
Coram
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/8363/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court