Neel Kumar v. State of Hp and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the appointment of Respondent-5 as Part Time Multi Task Worker, seeking quashing of appointment and directing appointment to the petitioner. The Court recognized applicability of newly added Rule-19 for appeals filed within 15 days, permitting the petitioner to file an appeal to the Additional District Magistrate instead of deciding the writ petition on merits.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 11th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5709 of 2022
Between:-
NEEL KUMAR S/O SH. INDER SINGH, R/O VPO & TEHSIL KOTLI, DISTRICT MANDI, HP, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
….PETITIONER
(BY MR. G.R. PALSRA,ADVOCATE) AND
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can approach the Additional District Magistrate via appeal under newly added Rule-19 notwithstanding that the selection result was declared before the rule's incorporation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neel Kumar
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
- respondent
Deputy Director Elementary Education
- respondent
Block Elementary Education Officer
- respondent
Selection Committee
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/5709/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court