Anita Devi v. State of Hp and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Himachal Pradesh permitted petitioner to file appeal with Additional District Magistrate under newly added Rule 19 of PTMTW Policy, 2020. Petitioner excluded from Part Time selection; court directed authority to decide on merits without rejection on delay grounds.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4483 of 2022
Between:-
| ANITA DEVI WIFE OF SH. OM |
|---|
| PRAKASH, RESIDENT OF |
| VILLAGE DHAMANDER, P.O. |
| BHAROLI, TEHSIL RAJGARH, |
| DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P. AGED 36 |
| YEARS. |
….PETITIONER
(BY MR. SUDHIR THAKUR, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR. KARUN NEGI, ADVOCATE)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner eligible for Part Time Multi Task Worker selection can approach Additional District Magistrate for appeal under newly added Rule 19 after impugned selection result.
Whether the Additional District Magistrate can consider the appeal on merits despite the selection date preceding the addition of Rule 19.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anita Devi w/o Sh. Om Prakash
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
- respondent
Sub Divisional Magistrate Rahulgarh
- respondent
Block Elementary Education Officer Rahulgarh
- respondent
Sh. Mohan Lal Son of Sh. Kirpa Ram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/4483/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court