Order closing Writ Petition No. 3064 of 2019 after filing a compliance report. Court exercised discretion to grant quietus, keeping the remedy open for the aggrieved petitioner.
Matter closed with liberty to avail available legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Bishnu Kumar Aggarwal Vs. State of H.P. & Others
CWP No. 3064 of 2019
22.05.2023
Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kavita Kajal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.S. Guleria, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocates General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondents
Learned Deputy Advocate General has filed the compliance report. Having gone through the same, we deem it appropriate to give quietus to the matter. Accordingly, the matter is closed. However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail the remedy, as available to him under the Law.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Virender Singh) Judge
May 22, 2023(ps)
Bishnu Kumar Aggarwal
State of H.P.
Others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
