A petitioner in a civil Wr petition instructed counsel not to press the matter. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed and reserved pending applications.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 2509 of 2022 Decided on: 16.12.2022 Pawan Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
State of H. P. & & Anr. …Respondents Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy. A.Gs.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under instructions not to press the instant petition. His statement is taken on record.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) 16th December, 2022 Judge (sanjeev)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Pawan Kumar
State of H. P. & Anr.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
