The High Court observed that respondents complied with the previous judgment dated 1.12.2022 by passing a consideration order. Consequently, the court held no further orders were required and disposed of the matter, while reserving the right to approach other legal remedies if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Jagdish Sharma Vs. State of HP & ors
CWP No. 1922 of 2020 & CWPs No. 1921 of 2020 and 1920 of 2020
12.1.2023 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Yash Wardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Since, the respondents have complied with the judgment dated 1.12.2022 by passing a consideration order, therefore no further orders are required to be passed in the matter and the same is closed.
However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner(s) is/are aggrieved by the said order, he/they are at liberty to avail such remedy, as available to him/them, under the law.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) Judge
January 12, 2023 ( kalpana)
Jagdish Sharma
State of HP
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
