The single judge allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition, dismissing the case with liberty to file afresh.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.1057 of 2013
Date of Decision: 15.12.2022
____________ ______________________________________________ Suresh Kumar Verma & Others …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Others … Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar and Mr. Narender Guleria, Additional Advocate Generals.
___________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if required and desired. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
15th December, 2022 (shankar)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Suresh Kumar Verma & Others
State of H.P. & Others
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
