The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted the petitioner leave to withdraw the present petition subject to a liberty to file it afresh.
leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file it afresh
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 2451 of 2022
Date of decision : 13.12.2022. Vijay Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Narender Thakur, Dy. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh. Prayer being innocuous is allowed, reserving liberty as aforesaid.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
13th December, 2022 (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Vijay Kumar
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
