Court dismissed an application filed by the applicant-appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal, noting the appeal was subsequently admitted.
Condonation of 28 days delay in filing appeal; directions to register appeal and expedite hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No. 1684/2022
01.08.2022 Present:
Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr. Addl. AG, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. AGs, Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy. AGs and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondent-State.
Cr. MP(M) No. 1684/2022
For the reasons stated in the application,
coupled with the fact that the applicant-appellant is in custody, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 28 days that has crept-up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of.
Cr. MP No. 2254/2022
For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No.
Appeal be registered.
Admit . Call for the records. Hearing be
expedited.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 1st August, 2022 (raman)
Sanjay Kumar
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
