The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, disposed of a criminal Misc. Petition (No. 148 of 2018) as infructuous because the challenged judgment had already been executed.
The petition disposed of as infructuous; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
| CR No. 148 of 2018 Decided on: December 19, 2022 |
|---|
| ________________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar Bhatia ………..Petitioner Versus |
| Ram Saran ….Respondent |
| ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ |
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. |
For the Respondent : Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. ________________________________________________________ |
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since judgment laid challenge has been executed present petition has been rendered infructuous as such, same may be disposed of accordingly. Ordered accordingly.
Present petition stands disposed of as infructuous, alongwith all pending application. Interim directions, if any, stand vacated.
(Sandeep Sharma)
Judge
December 19, 2022 (vikrant)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Pawan Kumar Bhatia
Ram Saran
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
