Contempt Petition No. 50 of 2020 was dismissed as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner's counsel. No further orders were required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ON THE 5th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 50 of 2020
Between:-
SH. BRIJ LAL, S/O SH. SHYAMA RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JARAL, P.O. UKHALI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT HAMIRPUR, H.P.
….PETITIONER
(MS. ARCHNA DUTT, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SH. R.P. VERMA, ENGINEERIN-CHIEF, HPPWD, SHIMLA-2.
2. SH. KEHAR SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF ENGINEER, (CZ) HPPWD, MANDI, DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.
3. SH. PRABODH SEXENA, ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY (FINANCE) GOVT. OF H.P.
....RESPONDENTS
(MR. DESH RAJ THAKUR, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR. NARENDER THAKUR, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL AND MR. MANOJ BAGGA, ASSISTANT ADVOCATE GENERAL,)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the
Court passed the following:
-2-
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with
the passage of time, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
5th September, 2022 (kck)
Sh. Brij Lal
Sh. R.P. Verma
Sh. Kehar Singh Thakur
Sh. Prabhodh Sexena
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
