A contempt petition was allowed to be withdrawn at the stage with liberty to file afresh, following the stay of the impugned judgment by the coordinate bench, pending disposal of other applications.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 348 of 2022
Decided on: 9th December, 2022
Sh. Hem Raj and ors.
..Petitioners Versus Sh. Subhasish Panda & Ors ..Respondents
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate vice Sh. V.D.Khidtta, Advocate.
For the respondents No. : Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl, A.G and Mr. Narender Thakur, Dy. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge, (Oral)
O R D E R
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the instructions according to which the judgment passed by the coordinate bench of this Court out of which present contempt petition has arisen, has been stayed.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
permission to withdraw the petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh, if need so arises.
Pending miscellaneous application(s) if any, shall also
stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
December 09, 2022
(Gaurav)
Hem Raj and ors.
Sh. Subhasish Panda & Ors.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
