Vijay Kumar v. Hrtc and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ex. Petition No.111 of 2021
23.09.2021 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.
The respondents have passed the
consideration order, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the same, in accordance with law and the matter is closed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
September 23, 2021
(tarun)/sushma)
Coram
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- EX.P./111/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court