Disposed
Umesh Kumar v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/7047/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
CIVIL WRIT PETITION (ORIGINAL APPLICATION) No.7047 OF 2020
Between:-
UMESH KUMAR S/O SH. GYAN CHAND, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALLI, P.O. PANJEHRA, TEHSIL NALAGARH, DISTRICT SOLAN, H.P.
……….PETITIONER
(BY ADARSH K. VASHISHTA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TECHNICAL EDUCATION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF H.P. SHIMLA.
2. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PERSONNEL) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.
3. DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, VOCATIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, HIMACHAL PRADESH, SUNDERNAGAR, DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.
4. MEMBER SECRETARY, IMC-CUMPRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE BANGANA, DISTRICT UNA, H.P.
5. CHAIRMAN, INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOR GOVERNMENT MODEL
2
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, NALAGARH, DISTRICT SOLAN, H.P.
……….RESPONDENTS
(M/S SUMESH RAJ AND ADARSH SHARMA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERALS WITH M/S J.S. GULERIA AND KAMAL KANT CHANDEL, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENEALS, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4; MR. RAKESH K. SHARMA, ADVOCATE, FOR RESONDENT NO. 5.)
___________________________________________________________
Whether approved for reporting: No
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court
passed the following:-
O R D E R
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a technical flaw in this petition, which may result in the petitioner being unsuccessful, and it will be in the interest of justice, in case, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the cause, on the basis of which this petition was filed. 2. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 5 has opposed the prayer so made by learned Counsel for the petitioner.
3
exceptions. Pending miscellaneous applications also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
Sept. 01, 2021 (narender
UMESH KUMAR
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TECHNICAL EDUCATION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF H.P.
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PERSONNEL)
DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
MEMBER SECRETARY, IMC-CUMPRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE
CHAIRMAN, INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court