Petitioner in a writ petition was granted the relief prayed for before the judgment, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on these grounds without substantive opinion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.103 of 2020 Decided on: 8th March, 2021 __________________________________________________________________ Jai Lal Chauhan
…..Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others …..Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ Coram_
…..Respondents.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Judge. Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
1 Whether approved for reporting? ______________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.S. Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ranjan Sharma & Mr. Anil Jaswal, Additional Advocates General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General.
Ravi Malimath, Judge (Oral)
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that
the relief prayed for in the writ petition has since been granted to the petitioner.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
In view of the submission made, the petition is dismissed, being infructuous.
( Ravi Malimath ) Judge
( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge March 08, 2021 (Bhardwaj/Mukesh)
Jai Lal Chauhan
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Ravi Malimath
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
