Disposed

Jeet Ram v. State of Hp and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC4 Dec 2021CWP/7647/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought transfer under the 5% quota and timely disposal of his representation. The High Court, without addressing merits, directed the respondent to dispose of the representation within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 02.10.2021 within two weeks from receipt of the order copy.

Jeet Ram Vs State of Hp and Ors. — Service and Employment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

ON THE 4^th DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA

¶5

¶6

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 7647 of 2021

¶7

Between:-

¶8

JEET RAM, SON OF SHRI SHARWAN DUTT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & POST OFFICE KARLOTI, TEHSIL GHUMARWIN, DISTRICT BILASPUR, H.P. PRESENTLY WORKING AS LANGUAGE TEACHER IN GOVERNMENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL GHALLOUR DISTRICT KANGRA H.P.

¶9

…..PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SH. MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND

¶12

1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (EDUCATION)TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA-171002.

¶13

2. DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171002.

¶14

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, KANGRA, DISTRICT KANGRA, H.P.

¶15

.....RESPONDENTS

¶16

¶17

(BY SH. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH SH. R.P. SINGH, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL)

¶18

This petition coming on for admission this day,

¶19

Hon’ble Ms. Justice Sabina, passed the following:

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The petitioner has filed the instant petition under

¶22

Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking mainly the following relief(s):-

¶23

“i) That the writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued, whereby directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his transfer from District Kangra to District Bilaspur under 5% quota as per notification dated 27.09.2021 of State Govt., Annexure P-2.

¶24

ii) That the respondent No.2 may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 02.10.2021, Annexure P-3 within time bound manner, as per notification dated 27.09.2021 of State Govt.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

¶26

that the petitioner is working as Language Teacher in Government Senior Secondary School Ghallour, District Kangra, H.P. since February 2011. The petitioner has sought his transfer from District Kangra to District Bilaspur under 5% quota as per notification dated 27.09.2021 (Annexure P-2). The petitioner has

¶27

¶28

moved a representation to respondent No.2 for redressal of his

¶29

grievance but no action has been taken on the same so far.

¶30

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without adverting to the merits of the case, we dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation dated 02.10.2021 (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period

¶31

of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶32

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also

¶33

stands disposed of.

¶34

( Sabina ) Judge

¶35

( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge

¶36

4^th December, 2021(Rohit)

Jeet Ram v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeet Ram v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Swarna Devi Vs Hp Board of School Education and Anr.

Reeta Devi Vs Hp Board of School Education and Anr.

Anchal Singh Vs the Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Ors.

Divesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Ors.

M/S Nikhil Enterprises Vs State Bank of India and Anr.