Surinder Kumar Vs Hrtc

______________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate.

¶10

Ravi Malimath, Judge (Oral)

¶11

Notice. Mr. Vikas Rajput, learned Standing

¶12

Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶13

Both the learned counsels submit that the matter is covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed on February 08, 2019 in Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564 of 2019, titled Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram Etc. Etc. (Annexure P-3).

¶14

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

¶15

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶16

2 -

¶17

respondent submits that in pursuance to the said judgment, if at all, any relief is to be granted to the petitioner, the same shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid judgment and appropriate orders thereupon shall be passed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this

¶18

order.

¶19

The writ petition is disposed off accordingly.

¶20

( Ravi Malimath )

¶21

Judge

¶22

( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge

¶23

March 06, 2021 (Bhardwaj/Mukesh)

Surinder Kumar v. Hrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Kumar v. Hrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Parkash Vs State of Hp and Others

Hira Lal Vs Hrtc and Another

Faquir Chand Vs State

M/S Thakur Dass Desh Raj and Co. Vs State of Hp and Others

Dinesh Kumar Vs Hrtc

Umesh Kumar Vs Hrtc