The High Court disposed of the writ petition following interim directions requiring the filing of a new petition. The court granted liberty to approach authorities or return for grievances.
Liberty to file representation to concerned authorities and approach the Court for grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3101 of 2021 Date of Decision: August 2, 2021
Akhil Sharma and others
...Petitioners.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 NO
For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the State.
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral)
Given the interim directions issued by this Court on 31.7.2021, it would be
necessary to file new writ petition. Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No.4/ University, also does not oppose such contention.
Given above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to make representation to the concerned authorities and also to come up before this Court in case of any grievances. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Anoop Chitkara, Judge .
August 2, 2021 ( ks ).
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Akhil Sharma and others
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
