Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh was granted. Accordingly, the present petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M) No. 971 of 2021 Decided on: 12.7.2021
| ___________________________ Mihir Ojha State of Himachal Pradesh |
_______________________________________ ………..Petitioner Versus ……….Respondent |
|---|---|
| ___________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sh Whether approved for reportin |
_______________________________________ arma, Judge. g?1 |
| For the Petitioner : For the Respondent: |
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar and Mr. Arvind Sharma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Kunal Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. |
(Through Video Conferencing)
| __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): |
|---|
Having perused status report filed by the respondent-State,
learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Permission granted. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
12th July, 2021 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Mihir Ojha
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
