Petitioner withdrew the criminal petition but requested expeditious disposal of the trial as he has been behind bars for five years. Court allowed withdrawal and directed trial court to try the matter at the earliest.
Petition disposed as withdrawn; direction given to trial court to dispose matter expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) No. 950 of 2021 Decided on: 07.07.2021
______________________________________________________________ Naveen Pun ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent _ Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
| For the petitioner : | Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : | Mr. Adarsh Sharma and Mr. P.K. Bhatti, Addl. AGs with Mr. |
| Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Dy. AG. |
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Police report stands filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage he will not press the instant petition, however, he prays that since the case is at the final stage and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is behind the Bars for about five years, learned trial Court may be directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
about five years, it is expected that learned trial Court will try to
dispose of the matter at the earliest possible.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 7th July 2021 Judge
(raman)
Naveen Pun
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
