Disposed
Chander Parkash v. Kumad Singh
Himachal Pradesh HCCOPCT/827/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ON…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ON…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
ON THE 2nd DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
CIVIL ORIGINAL PETITION CONTEMPT (T) No. 827 of 2020
Between:
CHANDER PARKASH, S/O SH. BALDEV SINGH, C/O SUDESH BHALLA HOUSE NO.518-A, MAIN BAZAR KALKA, WARD NO. 13, KALKA, DISTRICT PANCHKULA, HP.
….PETITIONER.
(BY MR. OM PARKASH GOEL, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT. KUMAD SINGH, MANAGING DIRECTOR HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RITZ ANNEXE, SHIMLA.
2. SH. MUKESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTS OFFICER, HPTDC, RITZ ANNEXE, SHIMLA.
….RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. NARESH KAUL, ADVOCATE).
Whether approved for reporting ?1 No
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the
following:
1
2
O R D E R
Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, informs the Court that the order passed by learned Erstwhile Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 235 of 2019, titled as Chander Parkash Vs. HPTDC & Anr., now stands complied with in letter and spirit.
In this view of the matter, the contempt proceedings are ordered to be closed. Notices stand discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
December 2, 2021 (vinod)
Chander Parkash
Smt. Kumad Singh
Sh. Mukesh Kumar
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court