Dinesh Kumar v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet.…
What did the court decide?
The Court disposed of the execution petition after observing that the retirement dues were already furnished.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.108 of 2020 Decided on: 31st March, 2021
____________________________________________________________ Dinesh Kumar
…..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …..Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram_
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Judge
The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting? ______________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate (Through Video Conferencing)
Ravi Malimath, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Managing Director, HRTC, Mr. K.R. Negi, Financial Advisor & C.A.O., HRTC and Mr. M.K. Sharma, DDM (Legal), HRTC are present in the Court. They submitted that the entire retirement dues have already been furnished into the bank account of the petitioner. The petitioner submits that he is not aware of the
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dinesh Kumar
- respondent
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others
Coram
Ravi Malimath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- EX.P./108/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court