Vipul v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2020 a /w CWP No. 1638 &1655 of 2020…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.1692 of 2020 a/w CWP No. 1638 &1655 of 2020
Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
05.11.2020. Present: Mr.
Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate General, for the respondents- State.
( THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
Compliance affidavit on behalf of the
respondents stands filed, which discloses that the
respective cases of the petitioners were considered, but have been rejected. Therefore, no further directions are required to be issued, save and except, in case the petitioners are still aggrieved by consideration order then they are at liberty to approach the competent court of law for redressal of their grievances.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
November 5, 2020 (Gaurav)
Coram
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/1692/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court