The court condoned the delay in filing a Revision Petition and disposed of the main petition due to an inter-party compromise substantiated by on-record statements of both sides.
Condoned delay in filing Revision Petition; registered Revision Petition; disposed of main petition via compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRMPM No.525/2020
9.9.2020 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner, through Video Conferencing.
Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for the respondent, through Video Conferencing.
Petitioner Shri Vimal Kumar and respondent Shri Deepak Jamwal, are present in person.
CRMPM No.525/2020
Heard.
No objection has been communicated for allowing this application for condonation of delay in filing Revision Petition. Whereas, it has been informed that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. Statements of accused-petitioner Vimal Kumar and complainant-respondent Deepak Jamwal, have been recorded, on oath, endorsing the compromise.
In view of the above, delay in filing the Revision Petition is condoned. Revision Petition be registered.
Application stands disposed of.
CRRST No.1756/2020 & CRMPST No.1757/2020
In view of compromise arrived at between the parties, duly substantiated by statements of petitioner as well as respondent, recorded on oath today in the Court, main petition alongwith application are disposed of, in terms of compromise, vide separate judgment of even date placed on the file.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing a Revision Petition given an inter-party compromise.
Vimal Kumar
Deepak Jamwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
