The criminal petitioner sought to withdraw an application with liberty to approach the trial court for bail. The High Court granted leave and liberty and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave and liberty reserved to approach the trial court for grant of bail is granted; Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Cr. MP (M) No.1901 of 2019. Decided on: 7th November, 2019
Surya Kant ……Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. ……Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Narinder Guleria, Addl. A.G. ASI Sohan Lal, Police Station, Sangla, along with record.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. (oral).
Learned counsel representing the accused-petitioner, after having made submissions for sometime, has sought permission to withdraw this application at this stage with liberty reserved to approach learned trial Court at the first instance for grant of bail and rightly so because after filing of the challan, it is learned trial Judge seized of the matter and in a position to pass appropriate orders
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
on appreciation of the given facts and circumstances and also the evidence collected by the investigating agency. Leave and liberty as sought is granted. The application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), November 07, 2019(ps) Judge.
Surya Kant
State of H.P.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
