The High Court disposed of OSA No. 1 of 2011 and CMP No. 5071/2018 after parties amicably settled their long-pending civil dispute through mediation, recording the compromise and decreeing the suit.
Suit decreed in terms of compromise; application and appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
OSA No. 1 of 2011.
Date of decision: 30.5.2018.
Smt. Ajeet Kaur alias Jeet Kaur ....Appellant Versus M/s Kuthiala Builders and others .... Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parmod Negi, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 4. None for respondents No. 5 and 6. Both appellant and defendant are present in person.
____________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
CMP No. 5071/2018.
It is heartening to note that with the intervention of the learned Mediator Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned Senior Advocate, parties have amicably resolved their long pending dispute.
2
Terms of the compromise stand recorded in the proceedings of the learned Mediator as also in the instant application. Application is accompanied by the affidavit duly sworn in by the parties to the lis. Parties, who are present in Court reiterate their statements and undertake to abide by the same. They have been made aware of the consequence of the breach thereof.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
May 30, 2018.
(cm Thakur)
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
Smt. Ajeet Kaur alias Jeet Kaur
M/s Kuthiala Builders
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
