against the bail petitioner, trial court would consider his case accordingly. Pursuant to aforesaid order passed by this Court, though petitioner had filed fresh bail application but that was not pressed and as such, was disposed of accordingly. Subsequently, on 1.3.2018, present bail petitioner again filed bail application before learned Special Judge, Solan, who vide order dated 3.4.2018, rejected the same. In the aforesaid background, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying therein for grant of regular bail. On 27.4.2018, when ASI Krishna from Police Station, Sadar, Solan, had come present alongwith record, Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate duly assisted by Mr. Somender Chandel, Advocate, while inviting attention of this Court to the statements having been made by prosecution witnesses during trial, especially independent witnesses associated by police at the time of recovery i.e. PW-1 Rajesh Thakur and PW-2 Rajesh Verma, strenuously argued that no case, if any, is made out against the present bail petitioner as such, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. This Court, having heard Mr. Bawa, learned Senior Advocate and perused material placed on record in this regard, afforded time to the State to ascertain the correctness of the certified copies of the statements of prosecution witnesses placed on record by petitioner.
