Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to approach appropriate court. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications were disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate court. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) No. 196 of 2018 Decided on: 01.05.2018
_______________________________________________________________ Jai Chibb …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……respondent _____________________________________________________________ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Ashwani Sharma and Mr. P.K. Bhatti, Additional Advocate Generals.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
Police report stands filed. When the matter was being heard, learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that at this moment, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach appropriate Court, as and when required.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
1st May, 2018
(reena)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
Jai Chibb
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
