Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the appellant at the given address and withdrawal of Power of Attorney, with no substantive legal question addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RSA No.541 of 2005. Decided on: 9th August, 2017.
___________________________________________________ Leelawati ...Appellant.
Versus
Rama Devi …Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the appellant : Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Nemo.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral).
As per the report received, there is no such lady, namely,
Leelawati (appellant) on the address, as given in the memo of
parties. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has already withdrawn Power of Attorney for the appellant. In these circumstances, as there is no such person, as given in the memo of parties, at the given address, so, the present appeal cannot proceed further. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
the pending application (s), if any.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 9th August, 2017 Judge (CS)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Leelawati
Rama Devi
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
