Dismissed
Vinod Kumar v. State
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/8340/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 8340 of 2012
Decided on 14.3.2017 ____________ ______________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar and others ………..Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ……….Respondents __________________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeev Sharma, vice counsel. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
CMP No. 1189 of 2017
By way of instant application, petitioners/applicants have prayed for permission to withdraw the writ petition. Keeping in view the averments made in the application as well as explanation given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it fit to allow the petitioners to withdraw the petition at this stage, with liberty to file afresh for redressal of grievance, if any.
CWP No. 8340 of 2012
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
March 14, 2017 (vikrant)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Vinod Kumar and others
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court