The petitioner moved a writ petition challenging a matter before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. However, by the date of decision, the petitioner withdrew the petition, rendering it infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No.2719 of 2012.
Date of decision: 3rd October, 2017.
Asha Devi .….Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others …..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr.Lokendar Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the present petition as the same has been rendered infructuous with passage of time. His statement is taken on record.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan), 3rd October, 2017. Judge. (krt )
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
Asha Devi
State of Himachal Pradesh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
