The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a withdrawn civil writ petition filed by the petitioner, granting liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action if necessary.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1550 of 2017. Date of decision: 15th September, 2017.
| Satpal Malhotra Versus |
…..Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| State of HP and others | …Respondents. |
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?1
For the petitioner: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with M/s Anup Rattan, Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate, General for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Neeraj Gupta and Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocates, for respondent No.3.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action, if need so arises subsequently. As such, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice. September, 15, 2017. (Sandeep Sharma) (cm Thakur) Judge.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
Satpal Malhotra
State of HP and others
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
