No petitioner appeared. The High Court held the petition had outlived its purpose and disposed of it, reserving liberty to approach the competent authority subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1285 of 2014 Decided on: May 11, 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jan Jagran Avam Vikas Sanstha and others …………….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the petitioners : None For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma & Mr.Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals, for respondents No. 1, 3, 5 and 6. Mr. Vijay Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate, vice Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondent No. 7. Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No. 8. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral):
Despite repeated calls, none has come present on behalf of the
petitioners.
considered view that the petition has outlived its purpose, as such, we dispose it of by reserving liberty to the petitioners/ residents to agitate the issue, if so required and desired, before the competent authority, or,
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
2
approach this Court on subsequent cause of action, if need so arises.
Pending applications, if any, are disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge May 11, 2017 (vikrant)
Jan Jagran Avam Vikas Sanstha and others
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
