The single judge allowed Cr.MP(M) No. 897 of 2016 and registered the appeal. The respondent appeared, waived notice service, and was issued a bailable warrant with a security of Rs. 25,000.
Appeal allowed and registered; bailable warrant issued for Rs. 25,000 against respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.MP(M) No. 897 of 2016
09.05.2017
Present: Mr. Virender K. Verma, Addl. AG with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the applicant.
Mr. Lovneesh Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for the non-applicant/respondent.
Cr.MP(M) No. 897 of 2016
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that
the applicant has an arguable case and there are certain points involved in the appeal which needs consideration. In view of this, the present application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No.
Appeal be registered.
Admit.
Notice. Mr. Lovneesh Thakur, Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
Issue bailable warrant against the
accused/respondent to the tune of ` 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, returnable within six weeks, undertaking therein to appear before this Court as and when directed and to receive any sentence which may be imposed on the conclusion of the appeal.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 9th May, 2017 (raman)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Unnamed Applicant
Unnamed Respondent
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
