State of Hp v. Kapil Verma @ Pinku
Case brief
What is this about?
No.1088 of 2017. 24.08.2017 Present:…
What did the court decide?
Bailable warrants of ₹1,00,000 each with one surety each issued against respondents.
No.1088 of 2017. 24.08.2017 Present:…
Bailable warrants of ₹1,00,000 each with one surety each issued against respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.M.P.(M) No.1088 of 2017.
24.08.2017 Present: Mr.V.S.Chauhan, Additional Advocate General with Mr.Puneet Rajta, Deputy Advocate General and Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for the appellant-State.
Cr.M.P.(M) No.1088 of 2017.
Heard. Leave to appeal granted. Application stands
disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2017.
Admit.
Bailable warrants in the sum of `1,00,000/- each with
one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer be issued against the respondents undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when directed and to receive the sentence which may be imposed on the conclusion of the appeal.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan), Judge.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), August 24, 2017. Judge. (krt)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Vivek Singh Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court