Both Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions (Ms) were allowed to be withdrawn. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file them afresh.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) Nos.1011 & 1012 of 2017. Decided on: 30th August, 2017.
___________________________________________________ 1. Cr.MP (M) No.1011 of 2017 Geeta Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent. 2. Cr.MP (M) No.1012 of 2017 Atul Singh alias Tully …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Virender Kumar Verma, Addl. AG, Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondent.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner (s)
seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty reserved to approach this Court as and when required. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the same afresh as and when required.
withdrawn, so also the pending application (s), if any.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 30th August, 2017 Judge (CS)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Geeta Devi
State of Himachal Pradesh
Atul Singh alias Tully
State of Himachal Pradesh
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
