Hemlata v. Vijay Motiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP No.41 of 2017 in Criminal Revision No.334 of 2016. Decided on :29th May, 2017.
Hem Lata ....Petitioner. Versus Vijay Motiyan .…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that he does not want to press the present application.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed, as not pressed.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 29th May, 2017 Judge (CS)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Hem Lata
Vijay Motiyan
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court